HOME: Online Issues

Transformation of Physical Characteristics in Fired Clay Bricks by Adopting Waste-based Fluxing Agent

E-mail Print PDF

mac2023

Mazlini Mazlan

Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, 35400 Tapah Road, Perak, Malaysia

Rabiatul Adawiyah Abdul Wahab

Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, 35400 Tapah Road, Perak, Malaysia

Nur Syafiqa Hamiza Sanusi

Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, 35400 Tapah Road, Perak, Malaysia

Nur Hanis Syazwani Mohd Nasli

Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, 35400 Tapah Road, Perak, Malaysia

Nurul Athirah Balqis Junaizi

Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, Tapah Campus, 35400 Tapah Road, Perak, Malaysia

Abstract
The current practices in the recent development of fired clay brick (FCB) by adopting waste materials have tremendously reduced the usage of the primary source of FCB, which is clay soil (CS). In this study, the main objective is to reduce the utilisation of CS as the main component in the FCB-making process. Other waste materials such as soda lime silica (SLS) glass bottles, and sea shells (SS) were also added into the precursor admixtures. The admixtures containing CS, SLS and SS  were mixed according to the empirical formula of (1-x)[40SLS - 60CS]: x[SS] = 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 wt.%. A batch of 40 g mixture was prepared, and 21% water was added. The admixtures were mixed, moulded into a rectangular brick shape, and dried before the sintering process at 850 °C. The physical properties of the FCB were investigated as a function of the SS content in the form of apparent density, linear shrinkage, loss of ignition and plasticity. As a result, the apparent density and loss of ignition of the FCB increased from 1.91 gcm-3 to 2.31 gcm-3 and 10.60 % to 20.81%, respectively. The linear shrinkage and plasticity percentage decreased from 2.50% to 2.27% and 11.01% to 8.70% with an increase of SS content. This study has uncovered the above findings, and has demonstrated a promising discovery of the SS as a possible substitute in FCB.

pdf

Keyword: fired clay brick, clay soil, waste materials, soda lime silica glass, sea shell

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24191/esteem.v19iMarch.21148

References:

[1]I. Labaied, O. Douzane, M. Lajili, and G. Promis, “Bricks Using Clay Mixed with Powder and Ashes from Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app122010669.

[2]L. Zhang, “Production of bricks from waste materials - A review,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 47, pp. 643–655, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.043.

[3]“Yongliang_2011_Preparation of eco-friendly construction bricks from hematite tailings.pdf.” .

[4]“Lingling, 2005_Study on fired bricks with replacing.pdf.” .

[5]P. Muñoz Velasco, M. P. Morales Ortíz, M. A. Mendívil Giró, and L. Muñoz Velasco, “Erratum: Fired clay bricks manufactured by adding wastes as sustainable construction material - A review,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 68, p. 783, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.023.

[6]M. A. A. Samah, L. A. Manaf, A. Ahsan, W. N. A. Sulaiman, P. Agamuthu, and J. L. D’Silva, “Household solid waste composition in Balakong City, Malaysia: Trend and management,” Polish J. Environ. Stud., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1807–1816, 2013.

[7]M. Sutcu and S. Akkurt, “The use of recycled paper processing residues in making porous brick with reduced thermal conductivity,” Ceram. Int., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 2625–2631, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2009.02.027.

[8]M. S. Sainudin, N. H. Othman, N. N. Ismail, M. H. Wan Ibrahim, and M. A. Rahim, “Utilization of Cockle Shell (Anadara granosa) Powder as Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregates in Cement Brick,” Int. J. Integr. Eng., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 161–168, 2020, doi: 10.30880/ijie.2020.12.09.019.

[9]B. A. Tayeh et al., “Durability and mechanical properties of seashell partially-replaced cement,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 31, no. March, p. 101328, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101328.

[10]P. Rodney Fernando, “Mechanical and Physical Properties of Fired Clay Brick Partial Doped with Coconut Shell Ash,” J. Energy Nat. Resour., vol. 6, no. 5, p. 58, 2017, doi: 10.11648/j.jenr.20170605.11.

[11]Department of Sustainable Natural Resources, “Soil Survey Standard Test Method Linear Shrinkage,” pp. 1–4, [Online]. Available: file:///R:/LITERATURE/Chris/10.1.1.164.7761.pdf.

[12]V. Loryuenyong, T. Panyachai, K. Kaewsimork, and C. Siritai, “Effects of recycled glass substitution on the physical and mechanical properties of clay bricks,” Waste Manag., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2717–2721, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.015.

[13]R. A. A. Wahab et al., “Physical properties of low energy consumption fired industrial waste-clay bricks from cockle shells and soda lime silica glass,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2332, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0042888.

[14]A. Ukwatta, A. Mohajerani, N. Eshtiaghi, and S. Setunge, “Variation in physical and mechanical properties of fired-clay bricks incorporating ETP biosolids,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 119, pp. 76–85, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.094.

[15]A. N. Raut and C. P. Gomez, “Utilization of waste as a constituent ingredient for enhancing thermal performance of bricks - A Review paper,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 37, 2016, doi: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i37/87082.

[16]L. Aouba, C. Bories, M. Coutand, B. Perrin, and H. Lemercier, “Properties of fired clay bricks with incorporated biomasses: Cases of Olive Stone Flour and Wheat Straw residues,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 102, pp. 7–13, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.040.