UiTM Press Pulau Pinang

HOME: Online Issues

Skip to content

New approach to minimise surface roughness in Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) through robotic spindle speed control


Wan Nor Shela Ezwane Wan Jusoh Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara, 13500 Permatang Pauh Pulau Pinang, Malaysia Shukri Zakaria Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara, 13500 Permatang Pauh Pulau Pinang, Malaysia Mohamad Irwan Yahaya Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara, 13500 Permatang Pauh Pulau Pinang, Malaysia Mahamad Hisyam Mahamad Basri Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara, 13500 Permatang Pauh Pulau Pinang, Malaysia Razak Daud Mechanical Engineering Department, Politeknik Tuanku Sultanah Bahiyah, 09000 Kulim, Kedah, Malaysia Noor Iswadi Ismail Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara, 13500 Permatang Pauh Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
Abstract
Machining Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is increasingly popular due to its chemical resistance, low friction, and high-temperature stability. These properties make PTFE crucial to industries that need fine surface finishes, such as aerospace, biomedical devices, and electronics. However, achieving practical surface quality remains challenging, particularly in robotic machining processes. This research examines the impact of spindle speed on the surface roughness of PTFE during robotic milling operation using KUKA KR120 R2700. Spindle speed was selected as the primary process parameter, and the experimental trials were conducted at four spindle speed levels: 4,500 RPM, 9,000 RPM, 13,500 RPM, and 18,000 RPM. The average roughness (Ra), root mean square roughness (Rq), and maximum peak-to-valley roughness (Rz) were measured through profilometry. Concurrently, a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) detected surface features with microscopic imperfections. The findings demonstrate a clear trend: a significant decrease in surface roughness values with a very high spindle speed, wherein 18,000 RPM provided the best results regarding the least surface defects and finer scratch lines. Moreover, the Ra value was the most significant in the present study and validated the trend between the spindle speed and surface finish quality. This research focuses on a new direction in enhancing the machinability of PTFE materials using a robotic milling technique in which spindle speed is optimised to improve the surface finish required in many industries. The research offers essential information for manufacturers desiring greater accuracy and control in PTFE processing and expands the knowledge base of robotic manufacturing technology for polymeric material. This research establishes the scene to address concerns about using robotic systems to improve surface finishes in various engineering applications.
Keyword: Physical Attributes, Chemical Attributes, Polypropylene, Microplastics, Size Surfactant
DOI: 10.24191/esteem.v21iMarch.4359.g3122
References:
[1]E. Dhanumalayan and G. M. Joshi, “Performance properties and applications of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)—a review,” Adv Compos Hybrid Mater, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 247–268, Jun. 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-018-0023-8. [2] J. Ni et al., “Effect of Drilling Parameters on Machining Performance in Drilling Polytetrafluoroethylene,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 19, Oct. 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196922. [3] G. Liang, S. Schmauder, M. Lyu, Y. Schneider, C. Zhang, and Y. Han, “An investigation of the influence of initial roughness on the friction and Wear behavior of ground surfaces,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 2, Feb. 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020237. [4] S. K. Ghosh, C. Miller, D. Choudhury, J. A. Goss, and M. Zou, “The Effects of PTFE Thickness on the Tribological Behavior of Thick PDA/PTFE Coatings,” Tribology Transactions, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 575–584, May 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2020.1728001. [5] J. Moder, F. Grün, F. Summer, M. Kohlhauser, and M. Wohlfahrt, “Application of high performance composite polymers with steel counterparts in dry rolling/sliding contacts,” Polym Test, vol. 66, pp. 371–382, Apr. 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.01.009. [6] J. Ni, R. Dai, X. Yue, J. Zheng, and K. Feng, “Contribution Ratio Assessment of Process Parameters on Robotic Milling Performance,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 10, May 2022. Available: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ma15103566. [7] A. Verl, A. Valente, S. Melkote, C. Brecher, E. Ozturk, and L. T. Tunc, “Robots in machining,” CIRP Annals, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 799–822, Jan. 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.009. [8] O. Ayanleye, V. Hammed, O. Akinrotimi, and A. A. Bankole, “Utilization of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) For Insulating Aerospace Cables,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 15, no. 4, Jul. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.34218/ijaret.15.4.006. [9] D. K. Dubey, A. Dixit, and V. Kumar, “Robotic Milling: A New Era of Machining,” 2023. [Online]. Available: www.ijfmr.com [10] Y. Chen and Y. Wei, “Simulation of a robot machining system based on heterogeneous-resolution representation,” Comput Aided Des Appl, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 77–85, Jan. 2016. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2015.1059198. [11] B. R. N. Murthy, S. R. Harisha, G. D. Deepak, and P. Hiremath, “Experimental Design and Optimization of Machining-Induced Cutting Force and Its Effect on Surface Roughness during Milling of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites,” Journal of Composites Science, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 346, Sep. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8090346. [12] C. W. Karl, A. E. Krauklis, A. Lang, and U. Giese, “Characterization of rough PTFE surfaces by the modified wilhelmy balance technique,” Polymers (Basel), vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1–17, Jul. 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071528. [13] H. Abedsoltan, “Applications of plastics in the automotive industry: Current trends and future perspectives,” Polym Eng Sci, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 929–950, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1002/pen.26604. [14] C. , & Z. W. Park, “Special Section ‘Fabrication and Properties of Engineering Plastic Foams,’” Adv Eng Mater, vol. 24, no. 3, Mar. 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202200172. [15] E. Moshkbid, D. E. Cree, L. Bradford, and W. Zhang, “Biodegradable Alternatives to Plastic in Medical Equipment: Current State, Challenges, and the Future,” Journal of Composites Science, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 342, Sep. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8090342. [16] Y. J. Sohn et al., “Recent Advances in Sustainable Plastic Upcycling and Biopolymers,” Jun. 01, 2020, Wiley-VCH Verlag. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201900489. [17] Jixiang Yang, Qi Qi, Abulikemu Adili, and Han Ding, “Robot_An analytical tool path smoothing algorithm for robotic machining with the consideration of redundant kinematics,” Apr. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102768. [18] D. Deshwal, S. U. Belgamwar, S. I. Bekinal, and M. Doddamani, “Role of reinforcement on the tribological properties of polytetrafluoroethylene composites: A comprehensive review,” Polym Compos, vol. 45, no. 16, pp. 14475–14497, Nov. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.28802. [19] J. V. Abellán-Nebot, C. Vila Pastor, and H. R. Siller, “A Review of the Factors Influencing Surface Roughness in Machining and Their Impact on Sustainability,” Mar. 01, 2024, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051917. [20] Ü. K. ??leyen and M. Karamano?lu, “The Influence of Machining Parameters on Surface Roughness of MDF in Milling Operation,” 2019. [21] B. Balakrishna and L. V. Suryam, “Effect of machining parameters over surface roughness in contour milling of aluminium 2024-T351 using 5-axis parallel kinematic machine,” International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 44, 2019. Available: https://doi.org/ 10.1504/IJASM.2019.10019944. [22] Z. Zhao, S. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Wang, C. Ma, and B. Yang, “Surface roughness stabilization method based on digital twin-driven machining parameters self-adaption adjustment: a case study in five-axis machining,” J Intell Manuf, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 943–952, Apr. 2022. Available: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10845-020-01698-4. [23] F. Ridwan and X. Xu, “Development of a surface roughness predictive model for STEP-compliant machining optimisation of a surface roughness predictive model for STEP-compliant machining optimisation’ Development of a surface roughness predictive model 207,” 2012. [24] G. Kant and K. S. Sangwan, “Prediction and optimization of machining parameters for minimizing power consumption and surface roughness in machining,” J Clean Prod, vol. 83, pp. 151–164, Nov. 2014. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.073. [25] R. B. Mundim and A. V. Borille, “An approach for reducing undesired vibrations in milling of low rigidity structures,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 88, no. 1–4, pp. 971–983, Jan. 2017. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8804-0. [26] J. Niu, J. Xu, F. Ren, Y. Sun, and D. Guo, “A short review on milling dynamics in low-stiffness cutting conditions: Modeling and analysis,” Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021. Available: https://doi.org/10.51393/j.jamst.2020004.